The current Mullett Board’s continuing discussions, actions,
inactions, and failures was demonstrated on February 4, 2014 when Supervisor
MaryAnne Gale again used I, me and my to attempt to sway the Board to adhere to
her agenda.
The issue of a proposed Mullett Township blight ordinance has
been on several meeting agendas over the last year and Supervisor MaryAnne Gale
chose again to ignore opposing views on “her” Board. She previously ignored
good advice from several people with practical knowledge of the trials and
tribulations of enacting, and even harder, enforcing a local blight ordinance. She
moved ahead with weak half-hearted support and wasted Board time, tax dollars, and
most probably thousands of dollars in attorney fees drafting a “proposed”
Orwellian blight ordinance.
A “hearing” was held in November, 2013 on the proposed Blight
Ordinance. Supervisor MaryAnne Gale apparently thought her ordinance would be
lovingly embraced. Why else would you have a hearing? A hearing should only be held
when all public and Board input has been considered and the “draft” is near final
form. Not so. Several public attendees and other Board members raised issues
with the unknown costs and the need to address issues ranging from trash to RV’s;
from stored fire wood to unsafe buildings when the stated problem was only junk,
trash, and rubbish. The draft also empowered Mullett Township to condemn and
appropriate property. This proposed ordinance was soundly rejected by a
majority vote and was sent back to the drawing board for simplification.
The revised, simpler Blight Ordinance was never published or
distributed for further review or input. It was allegedly pruned to “only”
address junk, rubbish, and trash. The concerns with the cost of enforcement and
in particular, who would be the enforcer was not answered.
On February 4, 2104,
a full year to the day after Supervisor MaryAnne Gale publicly started her
task, unable to gain the support of only two other Board members, the proposed Blight
Ordinance is “dropped”. Not tabled, just DROPPED. It’s her way or the highway.
The MaryAnne way, or the highway, was shown again when the
Boy Scout Park “concept” plan was discussed. Years of Mullett Board “talk”
never built a restroom in Boy Scout Park. The Board, including Supervisor
MaryAnne Gale, had approved a DNR style two holer pit toilet to be built by her
“uber” employee. Then, the Board decided to enrich Wade-Trim again and develop
a “concept plan” for the park to make sure the new toilet wouldn’t have to be
moved as the Topinabee water feature/”artesian well”/TDA monument required. The
Wade-Trim concept apparently now requires an architecturally designed two-holer.
Wade-Trim "Concept Plan" for Boy Scout Park |
Ask why? Ask Supervisor MaryAnne Gale why the “conceptual
plan” now needs this more expensive toilet? Ask Supervisor MaryAnne Gale why if
the toilet cost is justified, the included separate change room for people to
doff their swimwear is such a terrible and expensive burden for taxpayers? Ask Supervisor
MaryAnne Gale if her definition of “change room” is actually a diaper changing
table as her comments seemed to imply? Ask Supervisor MaryAnne Gale why, after
spending thousands of wasted dollars on her “blight ordinance”, reducing the change
room area by about 14 square feet to make it a storage closet is “sound” fiscal
management? Ask Supervisor MaryAnne Gale if her 30 minutes of I, me, my arguments
about the cost of two linear feet in building size was a waste of everyone’s
time? Ask Supervisor MaryAnne Gale why she thinks, after this and the previous Board spent at least four years sitting on their butts while park users had no place to
sit, the Mullett Board should now try to seek a MNRTF Grant and wait another
few years? Ask Supervisor MaryAnne Gale: Are you a contrarian or just argumentative?
A complete annotated audio recording is available on YouTube
A complete annotated audio recording is available on YouTube
Next post: a proposed $4,000 to $8,000 fix to eliminate
the Topinabee snow fence and is anything in Topinabee really “anonymous”?